Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Superior Responsibility

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the Brill platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Access this chapter

+ Tax (if applicable)

Chapter Summary

Pursuing accountability for mass atrocities through international criminal law has, by design, mostly involved trying those persons who bear the greatest responsibility for those crimes. The doctrine of superior responsibility entails an imputation of responsibility to superiors for the acts of subordinates that they omitted to prevent, repress, or punish. This chapter explores the development of superior responsibility and assesses the suitability of such a doctrine for contemporary international criminal law. The 1919 Commission on the Responsibility of the Authors of the War and on the Enforcement of Penalties made a concerted effort to introduce the idea of command or superior responsibility. The form of superior responsibility proposed by the majority of the 1919 Commission was not reproduced in the Treaty of Versailles nor relied upon in the subsequent Leipzig trials.

Keywords: 1919 Commission; international criminal law; superior responsibility; Treaty of Versailles

10.1163/ej.9781571053763.i-398.48
/content/books/10.1163/ej.9781571053763.i-398.48
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
6
3
Loading

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation