Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

26 Intervention by Third States

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this chapter

+ Tax (if applicable)

Chapter Summary

The basic assumption underlying the Statute and the Rules of Court is that there are two parties in contentious cases, and that for third parties an adversarial contentious proceeding is res inter alios acta. The very concept of intervention itself is controversial against the background of the consensual basis of the jurisdiction of the Court to decide any case. The Rules of Court adopted before 1978 are mainly of historical interest today, and illustrate the evolution of the Court's thinking on the matter. Some explanations and interpretations of the 1978 Rules have been made by members of the Court who took part in the work of revision as well as in formal judicial pronouncements. The intervention was only admitted in respect of a new aspect of the relevant convention which the Court had not been called upon to consider before.

Keywords: International Court; intervention; jurisdiction

10.1163/ej.9789004139589.i-1892.126
/content/books/10.1163/ej.9789004139589.i-1892.126
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
6
3
Loading

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation