Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The Writing Of De Visione Stellarum: Author, Date, Titles, And Influence

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this chapter

+ Tax (if applicable)

Chapter Summary

Of course the single most important argument in favor of Oresme’s authorship of the De visione stellarum is its direct attribution to him in the second “variant ending” of the Florence manuscript, B.N., Conventi Soppressi, J.X. 19. Björnbo’s and Thorndike’s oversight is understandable for two reasons. First, according to Björnbo’s description, there appear to be several leaves missing between the De vision and the alternate ending, and thus it might be assumed that Oresme’s “lost” manuscript had been excised. Second, the explicit of the two endings are not the same. McCluskey, in particular, has found rich correlations between the Meteora and the De vision. The De visione stellarum refers to a weak-eyed man called “Antiphon,” whom it says is described in Aristotle’s Meteorologia.

Keywords: Björnbo; De visione stellarum; McCluskey; Nicole Oresme; Thorndike



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Nicole Oresme's <i>De visione stellarum</i> (<i>On Seeing the Stars</i>) — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation