This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
I accept this policy
Find out more here
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
I accept this policy
Find out more here
Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.
This chapter analyses how the European courts refrain from providing full judicial review of lists of terrorist suspects adopted under European law. It demonstrates that judicial protection could be offered under the law as it stands and briefly introduces the two different types of sanctions. The chapter analyses the judicial protection from sanctions originating at the UN level and does the same for individual sanctions originating at the European level. Both types of sanctions are examples of multi-layered regulation originating at the UN level, followed by implementation measures at both the European and at the national level. It is argued that judicial protection should be provided before the Luxembourg and the Strasbourg courts, as well as in the national courts. The chapter looks briefly at the interplay between the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), the Luxembourg courts and the national courts.
Keywords:European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR); European terrorist; judicial protection; Luxembourg court; national court; UN level