This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
I accept this policy
Find out more here
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
I accept this policy
Find out more here
Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.
This chapter presents an overview of all passages that deserve to be characterized as a 'source' for the Mīzān al-ʿamal. Before presenting a list of comparison, it shows that the work of Ibn Sīnā that influenced al-Ghazālī’ in the Mīzān is not really al-Najāt, but rather Aḥwāl al-nafs. Furthermore, special mention has to be made of the recent discovery of a new ethical tract of Ibn Sīnā, which turned out to be the direct source of al-Ghazālī’'s discussion of the virtues and vices. Before this tract became known, it seemed plausible enough that al-Ghazālī’ had somewhat modified the ethics of al-Rāghib al-Iṣfahānī, or Miskawayh, while remaining faithful to a Neo-Platonic basis. Finally, it is obvious that al-Rāghib al-Iṣfahānī and Ibn Sīnā have many ideas in common and that one of them clearly influenced the other in several respects.
Keywords: Aḥwāl al-nafs; al-Ghazālī’; al-Rāghib al-Iṣfahānī; ethical tract; Ibn Sīnā; Mīzān al-ʿamal; Neo-Platonic basis