Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Reply To A.P. Martinich

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this chapter

+ Tax (if applicable)

Chapter Summary

This chapter presents the author's reply to A.P. Martinich, regarding speech act is the fundamental unit of analysis in the philosophy of language. It is essential to understand the nature of the speech act that it is intentional. When Conan Doyle wrote the Sherlock Holmes stories, he described Sherlock Holmes and John Watson as living at 221B Baker Street. There are some further important points made by Martinich. The author said that one has to think about fiction as an institution like any other, the main difference being that fiction is an informal institution. In some sense, any general human practice can be considered an institution, but notice there is a huge difference between fiction on the one hand and such institutions as private property, marriage or government, on the other.

Keywords: A.P. Martinich; Conan Doyle; non-fictional discourse; Sherlock Holmes



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Searle’s Philosophy and Chinese Philosophy — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation