Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Types Of Inconsistency In The Astrology Of Ficino And Others

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this chapter

+ Tax (if applicable)

Chapter Summary

The most important statement of magical theory written in this chapter was strongly influenced by the Hermetica, Ficino's Enneads commentary, Proclus, other Neoplatonists, and even Aquinas. The very last has it that &t;just as true astrology teaches us to read in the book of God, so the Cabala teaches us to read in the book of the Law&t;. We have seen internal self-contradiction within an astrological system, which may be unequivocal, its refutation requiring only reference to logic; or which may require interpretation, for its proof or disproof. Here we might say that we have an incompatibility between astrological practice and peaceable existence of a sort that Savonarola's pope feared as much as Honorius and Theodosius had done a thousand years before, when they decreed punishments of death, torture, or banishment, for divinatory acts.

Keywords:Cabala; FICINO; Hermetica; Honorius; Neoplatonists; Proclus; Savonarola; Theodosius



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Christian Humanism — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation