Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Commentary On Russell

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this chapter

+ Tax (if applicable)

Chapter Summary

Dan Russell argues that neither the Stoic nor the Aristotelian position in the "sufficiency debate" is acceptable. The sufficiency debate is the dispute over whether virtue is sufficient for eudaimonia. But the Aristotelian position fails, says Russell, because it attempts to combine contradictory views about agency and eudaimonia. He claims that Aristotelians try to maintain both a "directive conception" of goodness and an "additive conception" of goodness. The Stoic position fails, Russell concedes, because its purely formalized conception of agency fails to acknowledge that happiness is vulnerable to reversals of fortune. The author argues that Russell's alternative changes the terms of the debate and so fail to resolve it. The author also argues that a proper interpretation of Aristotle reveals that his position is consistent in accepting a directive conception of goodness, rejecting an unqualified additive conception of goodness, but acknowledging that virtuous activity is not sufficient for happiness.

Keywords: Aristotle; Dan Russell; eudaimonia; Stoics

10.1163/ej.9789004177420.i-310.28
/content/books/10.1163/ej.9789004177420.i-310.28
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
6
3
Loading

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation