Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Commentary On Sefrin-Weis

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this chapter

+ Tax (if applicable)

Chapter Summary

This chapter begins by raising questions about Sefrin-Weis' claim that the pros hen relation, as applied to being, does not involve logical dependence. It explains that Aristotle conceives of the pros hen relation as involving the definitional priority of a primary signification of a term (e.g., 'healthy' as applied to an organism) to various secondary significations (e.g., 'healthy' as applied to types of food), and in this way it does involve logical dependence. Then the chapter tries to show that, contrary to Sefrin-Weis' claim, the pros hen relation, as Aristotle understands it, does involve content; since it involves a relation among definitions or accounts of a term, it necessarily involves some content. The chapter concludes with some reflections about the priority of ousia to other kinds of beings, and Aristotle's famous claim that the study of being is the study of ousia .

Keywords: Aristotle; Sefrin-Weis



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation