Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The Elusive Pro-Arbitration Priority In Contemporary Court Scrutiny Of Arbitral Awards

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this chapter

+ Tax (if applicable)

Chapter Summary

It is well known that there are more and more court cases world-wide in which the courts are taking a deferential position towards arbitral awards. Today, there are emerging problem-patterns in regard to which the question needs to be raised as to whether upholding a party stipulation regarding arbitration, or upholding an award is always and necessarily pro-arbitration. This part focuses on three emerging problem-patterns which have become distinctive features of contemporary court scrutiny of arbitral awards: (1) the impact of party autonomy on standards of court scrutiny; (2) Developments testing the flexibility of grounds for challenge; and (3) Interaction between various instances of scrutiny.

Keywords: arbitral awards; contemporary court scrutiny; pro-arbitration



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Collected Courses of the Xiamen Academy of International Law, Volume 2 (2009) — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation