This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
I accept this policy
Find out more here
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
I accept this policy
Find out more here
Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.
In this chapter, the author has tried to provide the likeliest answers to questions that scholars have posed about Copernicus's natural philosophy. The author has based the answers in part on an acquaintance with Copernicus's intellectual milieu, that is, sources that are either known or are reasonably assumed to have been available to him, and in part on a systematic approach to his major works. The author concludes that Copernicus also drew on schools and communities of the Aristotelian tradition. He combined them into an uneasy synthesis with all of the ambiguities and inconsistencies that one would expect. Why Copernicus thought that a moving Earth would remedy the mistakes of his predecessors is not at all clear. Copernicus's account of the motions of elemental bodies is presented, and the author takes up the questions about impetus as they relate to Copernicus's remarks on elements and elemental motions.
Keywords: Aristotle; circle; Copernicus; Earth; heliocentric theory; natural philosopher; Sun