Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Are Some States And Minorities More Equal Than Others? Double Standards And The Work Of The OSCE High Commissioner On National Minorities

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the Brill platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Access this chapter

+ Tax (if applicable)

Chapter Summary

The purpose of this article is to discuss the challenge of double standards in the work of the High Commissioner and to address the main criticisms raised against the HCNM in this context. It describes the mandate of the HCNM as a conflict prevention instrument, which stipulates focus on security with built-in flexibility can be mis-interpreted as conducive to the application of double standards. It then moves on to the exposition of the main criticisms of the HCNM's security-focused approach. This article highlights some of the most interesting and challenging arguments from that debate and addressed them from the point of view of the institution of the High Commissioner. It shows that the HCNM's approach is justified first because security and human rights are closely inter-connected at many different levels and, second, because the question of national minorities is multi-dimensional and requires a comprehensive approach that goes beyond human rights.

Keywords: Double standards; HCNM; High commissioner; human rights; National Minorities

10.1163/ej.9789004185791.i-440.27
/content/books/10.1163/ej.9789004185791.i-440.27
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
6
3
Loading

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation