Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The Case Of The Corrupting Consensus

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this chapter

+ Tax (if applicable)

Chapter Summary

In this chapter, the author illustrates some examples from the area of the history of ancient Israel. For those who can remember the 60s and 70s one can probably remember some of the main areas of consensus in Old Testament/Hebrew Bible scholarship. The consensus starts to assert a powerful influence simply because it has been around a while. People will use the consensus as a weapon against new ideas. Instead of using weighty and valid arguments against the new thesis, they trot out the position that the existence of a consensus shows the other idea must be erroneous. The default position is assumed to be that of the consensus; the burden of proof is placed on the new idea. The trouble is that flaws in a new theory are used as a reason for rejecting it, but the consensus position is not evaluated on the same grounds.

Keywords: ancient Israel; consensus; Hebrew Bible scholarship; Old Testament



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Between Evidence and Ideology — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation