Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Res Mancipi

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this chapter

+ Tax (if applicable)

Chapter Summary

In the early Roman Republic, it was important to know whether an animal belonged to the category of res mancipi or res nec mancipi, since there was a difference in the requirements for the transfer of ownership. The distinction between res mancipi and res nec mancipi became less relevant in the late Republic, because the praetor granted praetorian ownership to the transferee when res mancipi had been delivered by traditio. In the 19th century, scholars presumed that, in ancient Rome, beasts of draught and burden were considered res mancipi from birth and, therefore, they qualified the Sabinian school as traditional. The Proculians held that domestication was a turning point in the life of the animals. Since the new and domesticated animal was radically different from the old animal, only the new one met with the legal requirement to fall into the category of res mancipi.

Keywords: animals; Proculians; res mancipi; res nec mancipi; Roman Republic; Sabinians



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Gaius meets Cicero — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation