Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

In Iure Cessio Hereditatis

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this chapter

+ Tax (if applicable)

Chapter Summary

This chapter discusses the legal question that gave rise to the controversy between the Sabinians and the Proculians: 'Is it allowed for sui (et necessarii) heredes to transfer their inheritance to another person by means of an in iure cessio hereditatis'. The Proculians argued that the in iure cessio hereditatis by a suus et necessarius heres had the same effect as the transfer by a voluntary heir after he had accepted the inheritance. The Sabinians gave a negative answer to the question of whether an in iure cessio hereditatis by a suus et necessarius heres had the same effects as a similar transfer by a voluntary heir. According to the Sabinians, an in iure cessio hereditatis by a suus et necessarius heres was null and void. The Sabinians maintained that what applied to a voluntary heir need not apply to an involuntary heir.

Keywords: involuntary heir; iure cessio hereditatis; Proculians; Sabinians; suus et necessarius heres; voluntary heir



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Gaius meets Cicero — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation