Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Beyond Legal Smokescreens: Applying A Human Rights Analysis To Sterilization Jurisprudence

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this chapter

+ Tax (if applicable)

Chapter Summary

Sterilization jurisprudence provides a rich basis for examining the legal constructs that disguise social policy considerations. In the cases of Eve, Jeanette and Marion, legal concepts overshadowed the pivotal issue of equality for women with intellectual disabilities. All three cases deal with issues of competence, of parens patriae power, of substitute decision-making, of rights and of well-being, as well as with discrimination, equality and difference. All three cases raise issues of inclusion and exclusion in relation to the traditional presumption that women control their own bodies and specifically the access to decision-making around child bearing to which non-disabled women have access.

Keywords: rights of women with intellectual disabilities; sterilization jurisprudence; substitute decision-making



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Critical Perspectives on Human Rights and Disability Law — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation