Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Institutional Power, Collective Acceptance, And Recognition

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this chapter

+ Tax (if applicable)

Chapter Summary

The chapter has three parts. First, from Hegel's discussion of the question Who is to frame a constitution?, a distinction is introduced between two concepts of a social context for action, one atomistic and the other holistic or moral. In the second part, the Hegelian notion of a spirit of the nation is explained by reference to Montesquieu, who introduced a social concept of institution—as opposed to a merely political one—when he pointed out that legislators could establish laws, but that they could not establish manners and customs. In the third part, the question is raised whether a group of individuals could establish an institution by an act of collective commitment. It is argued that the exercise of instituting powers requires that an institutional context is already given.

Keywords:collective identity; constitution; Hegel



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Recognition and Social Ontology — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation