Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

What God Didn't Know (Sextus Empiricus AM IX 162–166)

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this chapter

+ Tax (if applicable)

Chapter Summary

It is sometimes wondered whether ancient philosophers ever entertained the idea that a person's access to his or her own mental states is radically different from the same agent's access to the external world. This chapter considers a passage of Sextus Empiricus that might be thought to come close to this notion but shows that even here there is no sign of a radical division between a private and personal internal mental world and the world external to the agent. At Adversus Mathematicos (AM) IX 162-166, Sextus offers an argument against the existence of god which depends on a notion of what it is to 'know what pain is like by nature'. The argument is based on the idea that if god exists then god must possess wisdom and therefore know which things are good, which are bad, and which are indifferent.

Keywords: Adversus Mathematicos (AM); ancient philosophers; external world; god; mental states; pain; Sextus Empiricus



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    New Essays on Ancient Pyrrhonism — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation