Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Language Change in English Newspaper Editorials

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this e-book

+ Tax (if applicable)
image of Language Change in English Newspaper Editorials

This work is a corpus-based study of the language of English up-market (“quality”) newspaper editorials, covering the period 1900–1993. CENE, the Corpus of English Newspaper Editorials, was compiled for the purposes of this study and comprises editorials from the <I>Daily Telegraph, </I>the <I>Guardian, </I>and <I>The Times </I>chosen to represent periods at ten-year intervals. The language of the editorials was investigated with regard to features that previous research had proved to be markers of such types of discourse as might be of interest to an investigation of the development of the language of newspaper editorials. <br/>To begin with, sets of features associated with the empirically defined dimensions of linguistic variation presented in Biber (1988) were compared across decades and newspapers; these dimensions included personal involvement and information density, narrative discourse, argumentative discourse, abstract discourse, and explicit reference. However, since the study showed that the features within each set often developed in diverging directions, the old sets were broken up and new ones formed on the basis of change and continuity as well as of shared linguistic/stylistic functions, specific for newspaper editorials, among the features involved. It then became apparent that, during the 20th century, the language of the editorials developed towards greater information density and lexical specificity and diversity but at the same time towards greater informality, in so far as the use of conversational features increased. The narrative quality of the editorials at the beginning of the century gradually decreased whereas their reporting and argumentative functions remained the same over the years. <br/>When the features were compared across the newspapers analyzed, a clear distinction was noticed between <I>The Times </I>and the<I> Guardian. </I>The language of the<I> Guardian </I>was the most informal and the most narrative while that of The Times was the least so. The information density was the highest in<I>The Times</I> and the lowest in the <I>Guardian. </I>In these respects, the<I> Daily Telegraph </I>took an intermediate position. The editorials of the<I> Guardian </I>were more argumentative than those of both the<I> Daily Telegraph </I>and<I> The Times. </I>As regards lexical specificity and diversity as well as sentence complexity, the<I> Daily Telegraph </I>scored the highest and <I>The Times </I>the lowest while the results obtained for the<I> Guardian </I>were in between the two.

Chapters loading Please wait...


Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Language Change in English Newspaper Editorials — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation