Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Determining Negation Scope in German and English Medical Diagnoses

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this chapter

+ Tax (if applicable)

Chapter Summary

One aspect of analyzing subjectivity in text is the detection of negation. Considering the case of opinion mining, where the difference between an author giving a positive or a negative judgement is of utmost importance, and this difference is often coded by means of explicit negation. This chapter focuses on application that is concerned with particular diagnoses in medical reports. "Finding negations" means identifying a negation operator and deciding on its scope, or the words representing the material that is being negated. The paper briefly mentions some related work, and introduces the negation annotation guidelines that we devised and the corpus we have built up so far. The chapter describes Negtopus, the implementation. It also takes a brief look at the prospects of using off the shelf syntax parsers for the task of negation detection. The chapter evaluates the approach and compares its performance to NegEx, a prominent competitor.

Keywords: medical reports; negation; NegEx; Negtopus; syntax parsers

10.1163/9789004258174_006
/content/books/b9789004258174_006
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
6
3
Loading

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Nonveridicality and Evaluation — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation