Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Chapter Nine: On Imperatives That Have No Past Form

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this chapter

+ Tax (if applicable)

Chapter Summary

Many bi-literal imperative forms differ among themselves in the way that future prefixes are attached to them. Future prefixes occur in the same manner on their plural forms. These verbs cannot take object pronouns because they are intransitive. One person says that the forms are derived from נְסַע and לְַקח, but the nun and lamed are elided in יִַקח and יסַע, and are indicated by the dagesh. The letter in which the dagesh should occur is not one of the letters א֗ה֗ח֗ע֗, but the qoph and the samekh, which can take the dagesh. Imperatives that do not have past forms have only the future based past. Each imperative that has a past form has two types of future: future with future prefixes and future based on the past that is transferred (in tense) by waw.

Keywords: dagesh; future prefixes; imperatives; lamed; nun; qoph; samekh



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    A Medieval Karaite Pedagogical Grammar of Hebrew — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation