This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
I accept this policy
Find out more here
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
I accept this policy
Find out more here
Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.
From the comparison between Mt-Mc and Mc-Lc, in C, an interesting phenomenon is revealed. In C, Matthew and Mark have in common a quantity of pericopes that we do not find in parallel places in Luke. In part D, the resemblances that we raised goes rather in the direction opposite to those noticed in the C: Mark and Luke have more things in common than Matthew and Luke. This fact is evident from the viewpoint of ordinance of pericopes and from viewpoint of content of same pericopes. The divergence noticed in the links is difficult to explain other than by the supposition that the part C had an independent existence of D and that the part D is formed gradually, by insertion with spaced intervals, to allow the development to diverse insertion stages. The original text of the chapter is in French.
Keywords: formation stages; insertion stages; ordinance; pericopes