This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
I accept this policy
Find out more here
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
I accept this policy
Find out more here
Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.
In this chapter, the author shows the difference between literary structures of D and C, and then looks to see how Mark and Luke had been aware of the instability of D, more specifically, what their sources, in this place, presented groups of disparate pericopes. The vital role that Mark attributed to the structures in Part D shows that he was aware that this part was formed by the groups of pericopes. For a long time we noted the presence of different groups of pericopes in the part of Gospel. By their editorial work, Mark and Luke demonstrated that they were aware that the part D was formed by heterogeneous pericopes. In fact, to explain the formation of C, it is necessary to use ordinance type common to three synoptics: this part D, by cons, cannot be explained in this way. The original text of the chapter is in French.
Keywords: disparate pericopes; Gospel; literary structures; synoptics