Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The Q-Problem Reconsidered

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this chapter

+ Tax (if applicable)

Chapter Summary

The Q-hypothesis, that is, the supposition that Matthew and Luke used, in addition to the Gospel of Mark, one other common source, called "Q", has occupied a predominant place in New Testament scholarship for more than a hundred years. There have always been opponents, either proposing another interrelation between the gospels or stressing the importance of oral tradition. The opponents were far from unanimous, and the Q-hypothesis dominated the field. There are some good arguments in its favor, especially two, which therefore have been repeated again and again: agreement between Matthaean and Lukan extra-Markan material is so great that it seems reasonable to think that both evangelists had the same source; and the order in which this material is arranged, is often the same in Luke as in Matthew. The Q-hypothesis could not be maintained without the assumption of a good deal of independence on the part of the evangelists.

Keywords: evangelists; New Testament scholarship; Q-hypothesis



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Studies in New Testament and Early Christian Literature — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation