Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Resurrection: Jesus, The Sadducees and Qumran

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this chapter

+ Tax (if applicable)

Chapter Summary

The argument, which presents the idea of resurrection as an absurdity, doubtless was effective against the common view of resurrection life, that is, as an extension of the 'good life' of this age. Jesus' argument is one from inference and proceeds from several assumptions common to him and his opponents: God said he was the God of Abraham after Abraham was dead; but God is not the God of the dead. If Jesus combined an argument for resurrection with an Old Testament view of Sheol and of resurrection, did such a view find expression elsewhere in first-century Judaism? Neither the eschatology of the Sadducees, nor that of the Pharisees, nor that of the Essenes as reported in the classical sources conforms to this pattern. From the texts published so far, it is probable that Qumran also combined an Old Testament view of Sheol with a future resurrection hope.

Keywords: Jesus; Old Testament; Qumran; Sadducees; Sheol



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Christ and the Future in New Testament History — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation