Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Roman Law in Antiquity

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this chapter

+ Tax (if applicable)

Chapter Summary

It is commonly argued that until the nineteenth century the injured party could not recover damages in a legal procedure when his negligence contributed to the occurrence of the injury, unless the wrongdoer had acted intentionally. This idea should already have been present in Roman law, but one has argued that the foundation of this rule in Roman law was unclear. This chapter discusses the role of the conduct of the injured party. It is twofold. Firstly, a good understanding of the relevant texts of Justinian's legislation is necessary in order to understand the later developments in the period of ius commune. Secondly, an exegesis of the relevant texts in the context of classical Roman law is important not so much because of the significance for the ius commune but because of the influence of this law on legal humanism.

Keywords: injured party; ius commune; Justinian's legislation; legal humanism; Roman law



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Contributory Negligence — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation