Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The grammaticalization and pragmaticalization of cleft constructions in Present-Day English

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this chapter

+ Tax (if applicable)

Chapter Summary

The present paper examines the development of the variation between a marked and an unmarked infinitival complement clause in three types of cleft constructions in 20th century English. Data from corpora of written and spoken British (BrE) and American English (AmE) evidence a significantly divergent development of these clefts types in speaking when compared to writing. The written corpora show a steady increase in the frequency of clefts, and a decrease of the to-infinitive paired with an increase of the bare infinitive, thus a reversal of preferences in both varieties in all three types of clefts. This erosion of to as an (optional) grammatical marker leads to a higher degree of syntactic integration and can be interpreted as the next step in the grammaticalization process of clefts in written English. The spoken corpora also show a significant increase of clefts in spoken BrE in the last quarter of 20th century. While the infinitive marker is still persistent in spoken BrE, especially in wh- and th-clefts (less so in all-clefts), it is virtually absent in spoken AmE. More importantly, though, the majority of wh-clefts in the spoken material are difficult to classify in terms of a canonical, bi-clausal structure because they show a lack of syntactic integration to varying degrees, the only link between the wh-clause and the focus being their co-reference relation. This suggests a different development of the construction in spoken English. Wh-clefts fulfil specific metapragmatic functions in terms of managing temporality in interaction, and have recently been analysed as projector constructions that foreshadow upcoming discourse and are structurally not fixed, but interactively produced, thus emergent and open. Thus, the paper argues that wh-clefts in spoken English represent a case of pragmaticalization, i.e. the grammaticalization of discourse functions, in which the initial wh-clause develops into a topic marker or discourse-marker-like phrase.

10.1163/9789401207478_003
/content/books/b9789401207478s003
dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
10
5
Loading

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    English Corpus Linguistics: Looking back, Moving forward — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation