Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Similarity in sex and reproductive state, but not relatedness, influence the strength of association in the social network of feral horses in the Blauwe Kamer Nature Reserve

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution

Relatedness is likely to affect the decisions of animals regarding their affiliations with conspecifics. Social network analysis provides tools to describe the social structure of animals. Here, we investigate the social network of a population of 27 unmanaged Konik horses in the Blauwe Kamer Nature Reserve, in the Netherlands. We test three hypotheses: (1) that related individuals will have stronger associations; (2) that individuals with low values of average relatedness to their neighbors in the network will have more links and (3) homophily, the tendency of individuals to associate with similar others, will lead to stronger associations among individuals of similar sex, reproductive state, age and rank in the social network. We videotaped 22 horses (excluding foals) and their interactions. Relatedness was calculated from the pedigree, which was based on parentage, determined by DNA analysis. The social network was based on spatial proximity data. There was no significant influence of relatedness on strength of associations in the network or an influence of age- or rank-homophily. We argue that the lack of a relatedness effect is not likely to have been caused by an inability to detect kinship. Strength of associations in the social network was significantly affected by the tendency of the horses to associate with individuals of the same sex and the same reproductive state. This social network pattern is not common in mammals, and the study of unexplained variation in choice and strength of associations may have important implications for other equids increasingly confined to reserves worldwide.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev bouskila@bgu.ac.il ; 2: Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev ; 3: Department of Animal Ecology, Utrecht University

10.1080/15659801.2016.1149921
/content/journals/10.1080/15659801.2016.1149921
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1080/15659801.2016.1149921
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Berger J. 1986. Wild horses of the great basin: social competition and population size. Chicago (IL): Chicago University Press.
2. Berger J,, Cunningham C. 1987. "Influence of familiarity on frequency of inbreeding in wild horses". Evolution. Vol 41:229231.
3. Berman CM. 1982. "The ontogeny of social relationships with group companions among free-ranging infant rhesus monkeys I. Social networks and differentiation". Anim Behav. Vol 30:149162.
4. Best EC,, Seddon JM,., Dwyer RG,, Goldizen AW. 2013. "Social preference influences female community structure in a population of wild eastern grey kangaroos". Anim Behav. Vol 86:10311040.
5. Blyton MD,, Lindenmayer DB,, Banks SC. 2014. "Maternal lineages best explain the associations of a semisocial marsupial". Behav Ecol. Vol 25:12121222.
6. Boyd L,, Keiper R,. 2005. "Behavioural ecology of feral horses". In: Mills DS,, McDonnell SM, editors. The domestic horse: the evolution, development and management of its behaviour. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; p. 5582.
7. Boyd L,, Scorolli AL,, Nowzari H,, Bouskila A,. Forthcoming 2016. "Social organization". In: Ransom JI,, Kaczensky P, editors. Wild equids. Baltimore (MD): Johns Hopkins University Press; p. 722.
8. Briskie JV,, Naugler CT,, Leech SM. 1994. "Begging intensity of nestling birds varies with sibling relatedness". Proc R Soc London B. Vol 258:7378.
9. Brown JL,, Eklund A. 1994. "Kin recognition and the major histocompatibility complex: an integrative review". Am Nat. Vol 143:435461.
10. Cameron EZ,, Setsaas TH,, Linklater WL. 2009. "Social bonds between unrelated females increase reproductive success in feral horses". Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. Vol 106:1385013853.
11. Carter KD,, Seddon JM,, Frère CH,, Carter JK,, Goldizen AW. 2013. "Fission–fusion dynamics in wild giraffes may be driven by kinship, spatial overlap and individual social preferences". Anim Behav. Vol 85:385394.
12. Chiyo PI,, Archie EA,, Hollister-Smith JA,, Lee PC,, Poole JH,, Moss CJ,, Alberts SC. 2011. "Association patterns of African elephants in all-male groups: the role of age and genetic relatedness". Anim Behav. Vol 81:10931099.
13. Clutton-Brock TH. 1989. "Review lecture: mammalian mating systems". Proc R Soc London B. Vol 236:339372.
14. Couzin ID,, Krause J,. 2003. "Self-organization and collective behavior in vertebrates". In: Slater PJB,, Rosenblatt JS,, Snowdon CT,, Roper TJ, editors. Advances in the study of behavior. New York (NY): Academic Press; p. 176.
15. Croft DP,, Hamilton P,, Darden S,, Jacoby D,, James R,, Bettaney E,, Tyler C. 2012. "The role of relatedness in structuring the social network of a wild guppy population". Oecologia. Vol 170:955963.
16. Croft DP,, James R,, Krause J. 2008. Exploring animal social networks. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
17. Crowell-Davis SL. 1986. "Spatial relations between mares and foals of the Welsh pony (Equus caballus)". Anim Behav. Vol 34:10071015.
18. Dekker D,, Krackhardt D,, Snijders TA. 2007. "Sensitivity of MRQAP tests to collinearity and autocorrelation conditions". Psychometrika. Vol 72:563581.
19. de Vries H,, Stevens JMG,, Vervaecke H. 2006. "Measuring and testing the steepness of dominance hierarchies". Anim Behav. Vol 71:585592.
20. Duncan P. 1992. Horses and grasses: the nutritional ecology of equids and their impact on the Camargue. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag.
21. Ellard ME,, Crowell-Davis SL. 1989. "Evaluating equine dominance in draft mares". Appl Anim Behav Sci. Vol 24:5575.
22. Farine DR,, Whitehead H. 2015. "Constructing, conducting and interpreting animal social network analysis". J Anim Ecol. Vol 84:11441163.
23. Feh C,. 2005. "Relationships and communication in socially natural horse herds". In: Mills DS,, McDonnell SM, editors. The domestic horse: the evolution, development and management of its behaviour. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; p. 8393.
24. Fischhoff IR,, Sundaresan SR,, Cordingley J,, Larkin HM,, Sellier MJ,, Rubenstein DI. 2007. "Social relationships and reproductive state influence leadership roles in movements of plains zebra, Equus burchellii". Anim Behav. Vol 73:825831.
25. Godfrey SS,, Ansari TH,, Gardner MG,, Farine DR,, Bull CM. 2014. "A contact-based social network of lizards is defined by low genetic relatedness among strongly connected individuals". Anim Behav. Vol 97:3543.
26. Gutiérrez JP,, Goyache F. 2005. "A note on ENDOG: a computer program for analysing pedigree information". J Anim Breed Genet. Vol 122:172176.
27. Heitor F,, do Mar Oom M,, Vicente L. 2006. "Social relationships in a herd of Sorraia horses: part II. Factors affecting affiliative relationships and sexual behaviours". Behav Process. Vol 73:231239.
28. Heitor F,, Vicente L. 2010. "Affiliative relationships among Sorraia mares: influence of age, dominance, kinship and reproductive state". J Ethol. Vol 28:133140.
29. Hirsch BT,, Prange S,, Hauver SA,, Gehrt SD. 2013. "Genetic relatedness does not predict racoon social network structure". Anim Behav. Vol 85:463470.
30. Krackhardt D. 1988. "Predicting with networks: nonparametric multiple regression analysis of dyadic data". Soc Netw. Vol 10:359381.
31. Kurvers RHJM,, Adamczyk VMAP,, Kraus RHS,, Hoffman JI,, van Wieren SE,, van der Jeugd HP,, Amos W,, Prins HHT,, Jonker RM. 2013. "Contrasting context dependence of familiarity and kinship in animal social networks". Anim Behav. Vol 86:9931001.
32. Linklater WL,, Cameron EZ. 2009. "Social dispersal but with philopatry reveals incest avoidance in a polygynous ungulate". Anim Behav. Vol 77:10851093.
33. Maher CR. 2009. "Effects of relatedness on social interaction rates in a solitary marmot". Anim Behav. Vol 78:925933.
34. Markerink M. 2002. Koniks, wilde paarden in Nederland. Utrecht: Jan Van Arkel.
35. McPherson M,, Smith-Lovin L,, Cook JM. 2001. "Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks". Annu Rev Sociol. Vol 27:415444.
36. Monard AM,, Duncan P. 1996. "Consequences of natal dispersal in female horses". Anim Behav. Vol 52:565579.
37. Nowak MA. 2006. "Five rules for the evolution of cooperation". Science. Vol 314:15601563.
38. Oliehoek PA,, Windig JJ,, Van Arendonk JA,, Bijma P. 2006. "Estimating relatedness between individuals in general populations with a focus on their use in conservation programs". Genetics. Vol 173:483496.
39. Opsahl T,, Agneessens F,, Skvoretz J. 2010. "Node centrality in weighted networks: generalizing degree and shortest paths". Soc Netw. Vol 32:245251.
40. Pinter-Wollman N,, Hobson EA,, Smith JE,, Edelman AJ,, Shizuka D,, de Silva S,, Wittemyer G. 2013. "The dynamics of animal social networks: analytical, conceptual, and theoretical advances". Behav Ecol. Vol 25:242255.
41. Podgórski T,, Lusseau D,, Scandura M,, Sönnichsen L,, Jędrzejewska B. 2014. "Long-lasting, kin-directed female interactions in a spatially structured wild boar social network". Plos ONE. Vol 9:e99875.
42. R Core Team. 2013. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R foundation for statistical computing. Available from: .
43. Robins G,, Pattison P,, Kalish Y,, Lusher D. 2007. "An introduction to exponential random graph models for social networks". Soc Netw. Vol 29:173191.
44. Rubenstein DI,. 1986. "Ecology and sociality in horses and zebras". In: Rubenstein DI,, Wrangham RW, editors. Ecological aspects of social evolution. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; p. 282302.
45. Saltz D,, Rowen M,, Rubenstein DI. 2000. "The effect of space-use patterns of reintroduced Asiatic wild ass on effective population size". Conserv Biol. Vol 14:18521861.
46. Sigurjónsdóttir H,, Van Dierendonck MC,, Snorrason S,, Thórhallsdóttir AG. 2003. "Social relationships in a group of horses without a mature stallion". Behaviour. Vol 140:783804.
47. Sih A,, Hanser SF,, McHugh KA. 2009. "Social network theory: new insights and issues for behavioral ecologists". Behav Ecol Sociobiol. Vol 63:975988.
48. Smith M,, Milic-Frayling N,, Shneiderman B,, Mendes Rodrigues E,, Leskovec J,, Dunne C. 2010. NodeXL: a free and open network overview, discovery and exploration add-in for Excel 2007/2010. California: Social Media Research Foundation. Available from: .
49. Speed D,, Balding DJ. 2015. "Relatedness in the post-genomic era: is it still useful?" Nat Rev Genet. Vol 16:3344.
50. Tong W,, Shapiro B,, Rubenstein DI. 2015. "Genetic relatedness in two-tiered plains zebra societies suggests that females choose to associate with kin". Behaviour. Vol 152:20592078.
51. Van de Goor LHP,, Panneman H,, Van Haeringen WA. 2010. "A proposal for standardization in forensic equine DNA typing: allele nomenclature for 17 equine specific STR loci". Anim Genet. Vol 41:122127.
52. Van Dierendonck MC,, De Vries H,, Schilder MBH. 1995. "An analysis of dominance, its behavioural parameters and possible determinants in a herd of Icelandic horses in captivity". Neth J Zool. Vol 45:362385.
53. van Dierendonck M,, Sigurjonsdottir H,, Colenbrander B,, Thorhallsdottir A. 2004. "Differences in social behaviour between late pregnant, post-partum and barren mares in a herd of Icelandic horses". Appl Anim Behav Sci. Vol 89:283297.
54. van Dierendonck MC,, Spruijt BM. 2012. "Coping in groups of domestic horses – review from a social and neurobiological perspective". Appl Anim Behav Sci. Vol 138:194202.
55. van Vuure T. 2014. "On the origin of the Polish Konik and its relation to Dutch nature management". Lutra. Vol 57:111130.
56. Wey T,, Blumstein DT,, Shen W,, Jordán F. 2008. "Social network analysis of animal behaviour: a promising tool for the study of sociality". Anim Behav. Vol 75:333344.
57. Wiszniewski J,, Lusseau D,, Möller LM. 2010. "Female bisexual kinship ties maintain social cohesion in a dolphin network". Anim Behav. Vol 80:895904.
58. Wolf JB,, Traulsen A,, James R. 2011. "Exploring the link between genetic relatedness r and social contact structure k in animal social networks". Am Nat. Vol 177:135142.
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1080/15659801.2016.1149921
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1080/15659801.2016.1149921
2015-05-05
2018-02-22

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation