Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Parental provisioning in relation to offspring sex and sex ratio in the great tit (Parus major)

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

Sex-biased parental care is expected if the offspring sexes differ in their energetic needs or if they differentially affect their parents' reproductive success after independence. Furthermore, parents should adjust provisioning rate and prey size to the needs of individual nestlings and the entire brood. We investigated experimentally whether parental care in the great tit varied with individual offspring sex and brood sex ratio. We created broods of skewed sex ratio and monitored parental provisioning behaviour as number and size of prey items brought to individual young and broods. We found that male and female nestlings were fed at equal rates and with equally sized prey items independently of the brood sex ratio. The male share of provisioning did not change with offspring sex or sex ratio. However, parents brought significantly larger prey items to male biased broods with a small decline in provisioning rate such that the total amount of food brought did not change. Our findings suggest that parents did respond to manipulated brood sex ratio without distinguishing between the individual nestling sexes. Bringing larger prey items at slightly lower rates to male biased broods might reduce the cost of solicitation activities or satisfy increased needs in those broods.

Affiliations: 1: Animal Ecology Group, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Studies (CEES), University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; or s.p.m.michler@gmail.com, Email: s.p.m.michler@rug.nl; 2: Animal Ecology Group, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Studies (CEES), University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

10.1163/000579510X517208
/content/journals/10.1163/000579510x517208
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/000579510x517208
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/000579510x517208
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/000579510x517208
2010-10-01
2016-12-06

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation