Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Exaggeration of display characteristics enhances detection of visual signals

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

Many animal signals have been produced by selection operating upon behavioural precursors that lack signal function, a process known as 'ritualization'. When the precursor remains in the repertoire, comparisons of its structure with that of the derived signal permit inference of the forces responsible. Selection for signal efficacy and recognition produce characteristic changes (e.g., increases in intensity and duration, and repetition). The tidbitting display of male fowl, Gallus gallus, has long been considered an example of ritualization. However, the changes associated with this evolutionary process have never been characterized, nor has there been any test of whether the signal is perceived as distinct from its putative precursor (self-feeding). To address this, we first analysed video recordings of males feeding and tidbitting. We found a significant increase in the intensity, duration and repetition of specific movements during the tidbitting display compared to feeding. These results suggest that tidbitting is a ritualized form of self-feeding behaviour, but the critical test requires assessment of receiver response. If females recognized the tidbitting signal as distinct from male feeding behaviour, we predicted that females would food search significantly more in response to tidbitting. The results of high-definition video playbacks support this hypothesis. This is the first empirical demonstration of the perceptual and functional predictions made by a classic ethological hypothesis.

Affiliations: 1: Centre for the Integrative Study of Animal Behaviour, Department of Brain, Behaviour and Evolution, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia;, Email:; 2: Centre for the Integrative Study of Animal Behaviour, Department of Brain, Behaviour and Evolution, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation