Cookies Policy
X
Cookie Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Fathers have higher motivation for parenting than mothers in common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus)

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

Price:
$30.00+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites

image of Behaviour

Parental care is necessary for infant mammals to survive because they are born immaturely. In rodents, the retrieval of pups has been used to evaluate the motivation for maternal behaviour. Common marmosets are cooperative breeders and their parental or alloparental behaviour has been evaluated on the basis of the frequency of carrying infants in a family group. However, under such a situation, the amount of time spent on carrying did not directly reflect the level of motivation for parental or alloparental behaviour because of interference by other family members. To directly evaluate the motivation for such behaviour in common marmosets, animals should be tested where each subject is separated from other family members. Although some groups have applied an infant-retrieval test in which an infant is presented to the subject to evaluate the motivation of each marmoset, there are no studies in which retrieval behaviour is compared among family members. We adopted the infant-retrieval test to compare the motivation for parental or alloparental behaviour among family members: 8 fathers, 8 mothers, 14 older brothers and 9 older sisters. We measured the time from the infant presentation to the retrieval of the infant by each subject as the index of the motivation. We conducted the test when the infant age was 1–8 days old. All the fathers invariably retrieved their infants promptly, but some mothers did not. This variation of responsiveness of mothers was partially explained by the amount of their experience of having their own infants. There was a tendency that inexperienced mothers took a longer time to retrieve infants than experienced ones. Older siblings took a significantly longer time to retrieve infants than fathers during the first few days, but their latency became the same as that of parents in the 8-day test period. Our present findings indicate that the motivation for retrieving infants differs between mothers and fathers. Fathers' motivation is invariably high whereas mothers' is more variable, and that parental and alloparental behaviour may change depending on experience.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/000579511x596598
2011-11-01
2015-01-31

Affiliations: 1: Department of Cognitive and Behavioral Science, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan, National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Japan, JSPS, Tokyo, Japan;, Email: casaito@mail.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp; 2: National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Japan, Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University, Inuyama, Japan; 3: National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Japan, Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University, Inuyama, Japan, CREST, JST, Kawaguchi, Japan

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Create email alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Name:*
    Email:*
    Your details
    Name:*
    Email:*
    Department:*
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
     
     
     
    Other:
     
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library

    Thank you

    Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation