Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Distribution Analysis of Wolfspiders (Araneae, Lycosidae) in a Dune Area By Means of Principal Component Analysis

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Netherlands Journal of Zoology
For more content, see Archives Néerlandaises de Zoologie (Vol 1-17) and Animal Biology (Vol 53 and onwards).

1. The study was part of an extensive ecological program carried out in the dune are "Meijendel" of the Water Supply Company of The Hague. 2. The aim of this study was to analyse the spatial distribution of 12 wolfspider species occurring within one area, since it was expected that a competitive situation might exist. 3. The lycosid populations were sampled by 100 pitfalls grouped into four regions. The contents of these pitfalls were sampled weekly during a period of 7 years (1-3-1953 up till 24-2 1960 inclusive). 4. For a description of the relations between the distributions of the species the technique of Principal Component Analysis was used (R-technique) . 5. Principal Component Analysis was also used on the same data to obtain an ordination of the pitfalls (biotopes) (Q-technique). 6. From the R- and Q-technique, the following hypotheses suggested themselves: a. The degree of cover or a related factor is most important for the distribution of the species. b. A difference appears to exist between similar biotope types nearer to the sea and situated more landinward. 7. The optimum vegetation type appeared to be different for nearly each species. The optimum vegetation type for each species in my study area is in good agreement with the type of habitat stated in the literature for the species concerned. 8. A number of species showed a gradual shift in spatial distribution in the course of the seven years period of sampling. 9. Since it was shown that the spatial distribution of wolfspider species was linked to vegetation structure and since it was established that the vegetation itself had changed in the course of time, it was concluded that the chronological shift in the spatial distribution of the lycosid species was caused by changes in the vegetation. 10. The technique of Principal Component Analysis was amended at the following points: a. The linearity (additivity) of the principal components (factors) was changed in a more realistic multiplicative (fractional) model by taking the logarithms of the data. The additive model, however, still appeared to be a good approximation of the multiplicative one in this case. b. The proposition that each principal component, if necessary after rotation, can be interpreted as only one real environmental factor, does not hold for second and higher degree polynomial response curves. c. In the Q-technique, the mean and variances should be corrected, when the samples cannot be regarded as taken from one well-defined mathematical population.

Affiliations: 1: Zoological Laboratory, Department of Ecology, University of Leiden, The Netherlands

10.1163/002829673X00076
/content/journals/10.1163/002829673x00076
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/002829673x00076
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/002829673x00076
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/002829673x00076
1972-01-01
2016-12-06

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Netherlands Journal of Zoology — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation