Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Distinction Between the Rate Theory and the Occupation Theory of Signal Transduction By Receptor Activation

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Netherlands Journal of Zoology
For more content, see Archives Néerlandaises de Zoologie (Vol 1-17) and Animal Biology (Vol 53 and onwards).

Two ways to describe the response after an interaction between a ligand and a receptor are the rate theory and the occupation theory. The response of rate receptors is proportional to the rate of association while the response of occupation receptors is proportional to the fraction of receptors occupied. Ligands are bound to receptors by dipole bonds and ionic and hydrophobic interactions. Ligand derivatives in which one or more atomic interactions with the receptor cannot take place will dissociate faster than the natural ligand. A faster dissociation from a rate receptor allows more associations between the derivative and the receptor resulting in a higher maximal response than with the natural ligand. The maximal response of an occupation receptor to the natural ligand and to a ligand derivative are the same. Analysis of dose-response curves allows discrimination between these two receptors even if the response can only be recorded a long period after the activation of the receptor.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Cell Biology and Morphogenesis, Zoological Laboratory, University of Leiden, The Netherlands

10.1163/002829680X00104
/content/journals/10.1163/002829680x00104
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/002829680x00104
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/002829680x00104
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/002829680x00104
1979-01-01
2016-12-04

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Netherlands Journal of Zoology — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation