Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Waiting Time as a New Component in Functional Response Models

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Netherlands Journal of Zoology
For more content, see Archives Néerlandaises de Zoologie (Vol 1-17) and Animal Biology (Vol 53 and onwards).

(1) The functional response of the three-spined stickleback to changes in prey density was determined by presenting individual sticklebacks (for 15 seconds) with different densities of Daphnia. (2) The observed response, at first sight a type II, could not be adequately described by the existing type II models, i.e. Holling's "disc equation" and Rogers's "random predator equation". (3) The above mentioned models assume that the predator is unable to search for new prey while handling. This is claimed not to be true in the case of the stickleback-Daphnia interaction. (4) A modification of the random predator equation has been developed, which is based upon a biological explanation of the predation process, and gives an adequate description of the data. Two components of handling are distinguished: external and internal handling. Searching can again take place during the internal handling time. From this the possibility arises that the predator finds new prey before the handling of the previous prey has finished. This would result in a "waiting time". (5) The new model has been compared with a model in which the attack-rate increases as prey density increases, which also gives a good fit to the data. Analysis of video-tape recordings of the feeding of sticklebacks shows however, that handling time in this "variable attack rate model" is not in accordance with the actual behaviour. (6) Similarities between the feeding behaviour of the sticklebacks and that of mites and damselflies have been discussed. The "waiting time" resembles the "bottleneck-effect" found in the feeding behaviour of the latter two.

Affiliations: 1: Animal Ecology Research Group, Department of Zoology, South Parks Road, Oxford; 2: Theory Division, Rutherford Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Netherlands Journal of Zoology — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation