Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Phylogenetical Constraints in the Evolution of Parental Care Strategies in Birds

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Netherlands Journal of Zoology
For more content, see Archives Néerlandaises de Zoologie (Vol 1-17) and Animal Biology (Vol 53 and onwards).

In species with internal fertilization, but without parental care, an evolution of 'maternal care' is fundamentally different from an evolution of 'paternal care'. Maternal care should be a pure EES. Paternal care should always be superimposed on a mixed ESS to stay (or not to stay) and to establish some kind of a pair-bond with the female from copulation until egg-laying. This implies that paternal care is less reliable than maternal care. This could have led to the evolution of female strategies and properties which raise the chances for male care. The above considerations offer a framework for the evolutionary pathways between the various parental care strategies and between their associated mating systems. Both paternal and maternal care might directly evolve towards biparental care. For the evolution from paternal towards biparental care it is more likely, however, that a transitional stage of 'uniparental care' will be passed. That stage is characterized by paternal care in most cases, but by maternal care if the male deserts. It is probable that the biparental care system with similar roles for both sexes evolved along this route. Since such similar role systems are widely distributed among birds, and since monogamous paternal care systems can easily evolve towards all recent mating systems in birds, it is advocated that the evolution of parental care in birds was primarily based on a monogamous paternal care system.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Zoology, Groningen University, Postbus 14, 9750 AA Haren, The Netherlands

10.1163/002829684X00092
/content/journals/10.1163/002829684x00092
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/002829684x00092
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/002829684x00092
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/002829684x00092
1983-01-01
2016-12-03

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Netherlands Journal of Zoology — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation