Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Recovering the Historical Rechtsstaat

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Review of Central and East European Law
For more content, see Review of Socialist Law.

In this article, the author discusses the historical development of the concept of the Rechtsstaat in both Germany and elsewhere in continental Europe and North America, and seeks to argue that the term, for reasons empirical and ideological, has become excessively vague and, therefore, almost meaningless as a historically descriptive word and form of legal polity. The article urges a return to a rigorously historical understanding of the Rechtsstaat in order to restore centrality to the role of political authority and state power in the broad sweep of German life and, by extension, throughout continental Europe, and in order to maintain distinctions among western legal ways and traditions, in this case the important difference between the continental, civil law notion of the Rechtsstaat and the Anglo-American, common law theory of the rule of law. The argument proceeds along two major tracks. First, the author explores the eighteenth and nineteenth-century origins of the Rechtsstaat idea and its powerfully state-centered identity amidst countervailing liberal and democratic currents, and how such statism has persisted in German history and intellectual life up through the contemporary era. Historical, legal, and philosophical writings on the Rechtsstaat, both within and beyond German borders, constitute the focus of the analysis. The argument's second principal line of exposition is a consideration of the influence of the Rechtsstaat concept on the west's study of the history of Russian law and legal development, especially in the late imperial era. In delineating the course of western academics' interpretation of Russia's recent modernizing past—particularly in contrast to the writings of pre-revolutionary Russians—the author discusses the gradual merging of Rechtsstaat principles with indigenous Russian legal values and European intellectual borrowings, the eventual, post-1945 global triumph of Anglo-American expectations for modern, developed legal life, and finally the assimilation of the Rechtsstaat idea to the now globally broadcast standards and values of the rule of law model.


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Review of Central and East European Law — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation