Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The EU Policy on Return of Illegally Staying Third-Country Nationals

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of European Journal of Migration and Law

The purpose of this article is to analyse the EU policy on return of illegally staying third-country nationals, focusing in particular on the draft EU legislation: the Proposal for a Directive on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (COM/2005/391).

This paper studies the context, the objectives and the most relevant measures of the proposed Directive in order to identify its critical juridical aspects as regards the fundamental rights of third-country nationals. It analyses the on-going negotiations for its adoption, considering in particular the exercise of co-decision procedure, which is new in this policy domain, and the link with the EU Return Fund, to see how the EU inter-institutional dynamics influence the establishment of provisions regulating the rights and status of immigrants subject to a return procedure.

The current findings show that the adoption of the proposed Directive is not an easy exercise: the issue is very sensitive and the on-going negotiations are long and difficult. Other institutions and various NGOs support the harmonisation process but criticise a number of provisions of the draft measure. EU institutions urgently need to find a strategy that could lead to the necessary agreement for the adoption of a 'clear, fair and transparent common procedure respecting fundamental rights'.

Affiliations: 1: Ph.D. candidate in European Union Law, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    European Journal of Migration and Law — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation