Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The Complementarity Regime of the International Criminal Court: International Criminal Justice between State Sovereignty and the Fight against Impunity

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online

Together with the provisions on jurisdiction, the principle of complementarity is the pivotal mechanism to delineate the exercise of jurisdiction by the ICC from that of national authorities, including national courts. Designed to find a balance between state sovereignty and the interest of the international community in the effective prosecution of international crimes, it may well prove to be one of the most contentious features of the Statute in its application. The principle of complementarity has thus been described as essential for the acceptance of the Statute by states, and is often referred to as the underlying principle or the cornerstone of the ICC Statute. The present article seeks to contribute to the discussion on one of the most opalescent notions of the Statute. Starting with an analysis of the rationale of the complementarity principle, it examines the substantive elements contained in Article 17 ICC Statute as well as the procedural framework as set out in Articles 18 and 19 ICC Statute. The article furthermore explores the question of the impact of Security Council resolutions under Chapter VII of the Charter and the possibility of states to "waive" complementarity.

10.1163/138946303775160250
/content/journals/10.1163/138946303775160250
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/138946303775160250
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/138946303775160250
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/138946303775160250
2003-01-01
2016-12-10

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation