Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Open Access On (Greek) Linguistics as a Science

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

On (Greek) Linguistics as a Science

  • PDF
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Journal of Greek Linguistics

This paper explores some of the pros and cons of the proposition that if Greek linguistics (included of course in linguistics generally) is to be taken seriously as a science, then it is not enough to simply 'confirm/corroborate/verify' a given theory from a given subset of data. Since corroboration can never 'prove' a given theory, we also submit the relevant data to the criteria of falsifiability (Popper 1963). For linguistics, this proceeds by appeal to two kinds of empirical evidence, viz.: a) intuitional (including native speaker assessment surveys as well as corpora analyses), and b) instrumental and other 'external' (e.g. acquisition, pathology) studies. All this despite the concession that falsifications can be circumvented (cf. Lakatos 1970); so indeed this paper deals with both the few successful (paradigm-replacing) and the many circumvented (paradigm-internal) falsifications. We begin (in section 2) with falsification-successes that culminated in paradigm-shifts in earlier sciences as well as in contemporary linguistics. We then (in sections 3-4) survey intuitive and experimental cases of falsification circumvention from contemporary linguistics. There we clarify that, although there is reasonable support for abstractions, modifications and unifications, experiments have so far offered only partial or suggestive results. Sections 5-6 sum up and conclude.

10.1163/156658411X563658
/content/journals/10.1163/156658411x563658
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156658411x563658
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156658411x563658
Loading
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156658411x563658
2011-05-01
2016-12-06

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation