Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Les juristes malikites en Occident musulman entre soumission et révolte (IIe-IXe/VIIIe-XVe siècle)


No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

Dans cette étude, nous montrons que l’attitude des juristes malikites vis-à-vis du prince n’était pas unifiée, ce qui nous permet de classer ces juristes en trois catégories : les révoltés, les soumis et les réservés. Si les révoltés participèrent à des révoltes et se permirent même dans certains cas de tirer l’épée contre le prince, les soumis, que les sources qualifient de ʿulamā’ al-salāṭīn, cherchèrent à rendre divers services au prince et mirent l’accent sur l’obligation des sujets de lui être soumis. La troisième catégorie de juristes porta son attention sur les devoirs du prince et tenta de se faire les porte – parole du petit peuple et de la religion. Nous rattachons cette diversité d’attitudes à plusieurs données historiques, dont la position ambiguë de Mālik b. Anas vis-à-vis du prince.
In this study, I show that the attitudes of Mālikī jurists towards the ruler fall into three categories: rebellious, submissive, and reserved: Rebelious jurists participated in revolts and, in some cases, drew their swords against the ruler; submissive jurists – identified in the sources as ʿulamāʾ al-salāṭīn – performed favors for the ruler and emphasized the obligation of his subjects to submit to him; reserved jurists focused on the duties of the ruler and attempted to give voice to the common people and religion. I link these three positions to historical data, including the ambiguous position of Mālik b. Anas vis-à-vis the ruler. 


Affiliations: 1: Ezzitouna University
hentati.nejmeddine@voila.fr


10.1163/15685195-00214p02
/content/journals/10.1163/15685195-00214p02
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685195-00214p02
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15685195-00214p02
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685195-00214p02
2014-09-22
2017-09-22

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Islamic Law and Society — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation