Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Neither 'Primitives' nor 'Others,' but Somehow Not Quite Like 'Us': The Fortunes of Psychic Unity and Essentialism in Chinese Studies

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient

This paper re-evaluates a persistent but controversial claim in studies of China—to wit, that Chinese thought exhibited a different logical structure than that found in Europe. By situating what is now largely regarded as a Sinological problem within the broader context of the debate between Edward B. Tylor (1832-1917) and Lucien Lévy-Bruhl (1857-1939) about primitive thought, it argues that this line of inquiry about cultural difference, as exemplified by the work of its earliest exponents, Marcel Granet (1884-1940), Joseph Needham (1900-1995), and Angus Charles Graham (1919-1991), is still significant. The significance of these works lies not so much in their specific arguments about China as in the general approach they suggest for explaining cultural difference, an approach that can steer clear of the dangers in evolutionary and essentializing approaches to the study of human mentality. Dans cet article j'examine de nouveau une prétension persistante mais controversée dans les études de la Chine—c'est à dire, que la pensée chinoise fait preuve d'une différente structure logique que celle trouvée en Europe. En situant ce qui est principalement regardé comme un problème sinologique dans le contexte plus large d'un débat entre Edward B. Tylor (1832-1917) et Lucien Lévy-Bruhl (1857-1939) sur la pensée primitive, j'affirme la signifiance actuelle de cette approche de la différence culturelle, telle que représentée par les écrits de ses premiers partisans, Marcel Granet (1884-1940), Joseph Needham (1900-1995) et Angus Charles Graham (1919-1991). La signifiance de ces ouvrages dérive moins de leurs arguments spécifiques sur la Chine, que de leur approche générale de l'explication de la différence culturelle, une approche qui peut éviter les dangers des approches évolutionnaires et réductionnistes de l'étude des mentalités humaines.


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation