Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

LONGINUS AND CAECILIUS: MODELS OF THE SUBLIME

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites

image of Mnemosyne

The article explores the relationship between Longinus and Caecilius and their range of model specimens. Longinus has a particular interest in Plato, not to defend him but, exploiting his canonical status, to present him as a prime example of the flawed genius. Plato illustrates a style whose rich amplitude carries risks but which proves that sublimity need not always include strong emotion. Caecilius recognised a narrower range of style and his prime model was Demosthenes (Lysias is irrelevant). The article exploits an undervalued source, Tiberius' On Figures in Demosthenes, and argues that there is influence from Caecilius not only in §§43-8, but also in the use of non-Demosthenic examples in §§26-35.

Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156852502760185261
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156852502760185261
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156852502760185261
2002-05-01
2016-08-26

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation