Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Interrogative Nam in Early Latin

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Mnemosyne

Abstract The article examines the use of nam in close association with a question word (e.g. quisnam, nam quis) in early Latin. As Kroon (1995, 165-5) observes, the use mirrors explicative nam, in that it is found when a speaker seeks supplementary information, while explicative nam is used to provide it. If interrogative nam arose from a sarcastic use of explicative nam to comment on a dialogue partner’s failure to supply information, this could account for several nuances that commentators have found in nam questions.

Affiliations: 1: Thesaurus Linguae Latinae Alfons-Goppel-Str. 11, 80539 München Germany nigel.holmes@thesaurus.badw.de

Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156852511x547802
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Bodelot C. " Termes introducteurs et modes dans l’interrogation indirecte en Latin de Plaute à Juvenal " 1990 Avignon
2. Ernout A. , Meillet A. " Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine " 1979 Paris 4
3. Hand F. " Tursellinus seu de particulis latinis commentarii " 1845 Vol vol. 4 Leipzig
4. Hoffmann J.B. , Szantyr A. " Lateinische Syntax und Stylistik " 1965 München
5. Kroon C.H.M. " Discourse Particles in Latin. A Study of nam, enim, autem, vero and at " 1995 Amsterdam
6. Kühner R. , Stegmann C. " Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache " 1914 Hannover
7. Langslow D.R. " Latin Discourse Particles, ‘Medical Latin’ and ‘Classical Latin’ " Mnemosyne 2000 Vol 53 537 560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156852500510778
8. Müller R. " Sprechen und Sprache. Dialoglinguistische Studien zu Terenz " 1997 Heidelberg
9. Schiwy P. " Die syntaktischen Funktionen der Partikel “nam” " 1932 diss., Breslau
10. Schrickx J. " Namque als Variante von nam? " Mnemosyne 2009 Vol 62 250 271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156852508X321158
11. Shackleton Bailey D.R. " Num in Direct Questions: A Rule Restated " CQ 1953 Vol 3 120 125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0009838800003062
12. Sicking C.M.J. , van Ophuijsen J.M. " Two Studies in Attic Particle Usage " 1993 Leiden
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156852511x547802
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156852511x547802
2012-01-01
2016-12-09

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Mnemosyne — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation