Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The Grammaticalization of Daimonie at Iliad 24.194

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Mnemosyne

Homer’s use of the address form δαιµονίη for Hekabe at Iliad 24.194, has been particularly troublesome, and these problems have remained largely unresolved because the word’s etymology, its later use, and its generally negative tone contrast with the otherwise non-confrontational tone of Priam’s speech at Il. 24.194-199. This mismatch has led to a wide range of interpretations, and no general consensus. In this paper I argue that the term here appears to be undergoing grammaticalization in the direction of a discourse particle, and as such does not characterize the addressee but the context of Priam’s subsequent speech. Although use of the term by later authors shows that this process was terminated, nevertheless, the development of δαιµόνιε proposed here patterns with that of other divine address forms such as Latin mehercule! and edepol!, French mon Dieu!, English oh my God!, etc. which have come to function like other discourse particles such as wow!

Affiliations: 1: Gettysburg College, Department of Classics300 N. Washington St., Box 394, Gettysburg,


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Allen T.W. Homeri Ilias, Vol. I, II, and III 1931, 1979 New York
2. Ameka F. " Interjections; The Universal yet Neglected Part of Speech " JoP 1992 Vol 18 2/3 101 118
3. Arnold T.K. Homer’s Iliad with English Notes and Grammatical References 1852 London
4. Ashdowne R. " The Vocative’s Calling? The Syntax of Address in Latin " University Working Papers in Linguistics, Philology and Phonetics 2002 Vol 7 143 162
5. Braun F. Terms of Address: Problems of Patterns and Usage in Various Languages and Cultures 1988 Berlin
6. Brown H.P. " A Pragmatic and Sociolinguistic Account of Δαιµόνιε in Early Greek Epic " GRBS 2011 Vol 51 498 528
7. Brunius-Nilsson E. Δαιµόνιε, An Inquiry into a Mode of Apostrophe in Old Greek Literature 1955 Uppsala
8. Chantraine P. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque: Histoire des mots 1980 Paris
9. Denniston J.D. The Greek Particles 1950 2nd ed. Oxford
10. Devine A.M. , Stephens L.D. The Prosody of Greek Speech 1994 Oxford
11. Dickey E. Greek Forms of Address from Herodotus to Lucian 1996 Oxford
12. Dunbar H. A Complete Concordance to the Odyssey of Homer 1971 Zürich Revised by B. Marzullo
13. Ernout A. , Meillet A. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine: Histoire des mots 1967 Paris
14. Etheridge G. Gibbons B. " The Man Of Mode " Five Restoration Comedies 1984 London
15. Fraenkel E. Noch einmal Kolon und Satz 1965 München
16. Gehwieler E. " From Proper Name to Primary Interjection; the Case of Gee " JoHP 2008 Vol 9 1 71 93
17. Haliday M.A.K. , Hasen R. Cohesion in English 1976 London
18. Hooker J.T. Homer Iliad III, With Introduction, Notes & Vocabulary 1980 Bristol
19. Hopper P.J. , Traugott E. Grammaticalization 1993 Cambridge
20. Hudson-Williams H.Il. "Review of Brunius-Nilsson" CR 1957 Vol 7 1 76
21. Joseph B.D. " Is There Such A Thing As ‘Grammaticalization’? " Language Sciences 2001 163 186
22. Lakoff G. Neisser U. " Cognitive Models and Prototype Theory " Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization 1987 63 100
23. Langacker R.W. Haiman J. " Observations and Speculations on Subjectivity " Iconicity in Syntax 1985 Amsterdam 109 150
24. Lodge D. The British Museum is Falling Down 1965 London
25. MacLeod C.W. Homer: Iliad XXIV 1982 Cambridge
26. Mader B. LfGE 1982 Vol Vol. 10 Göttingen 197 198
27. Maynard S.K. Linguistic Emotivity 2002 Amsterdam
28. Mosegaard-Hansen M. The Function of Discourse Particles 1998 Amsterdam
29. Richardson N. The Iliad: A Commentary, Vol. VI: Books 21-24 1985 Cambridge
30. Rieu E.V. The Iliad 2003 New York
31. Sweetser E.E. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure 1990 Cambridge
32. Szemerényi O. " Etyma Graeca VI " Minos 1987 20 22 569 580
33. Traugott E. " On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change " Language 1989 Vol 65 1 31 55
34. Traugott E. , Dasher R. Regularity in Semantic Change 2002 Cambridge
35. Verdenius W.J. " Review of Brunius-Nilsson " Mnemosyne 1959 Vol 12 2 147 148
36. de Vries G.J. " Remarks on a Greek Form of Address( ὦ τᾶν)" Mnemosyne 1966 Vol 19 3 225 230
37. Watts R.J. Politeness 2003 Cambridge
38. Wendel T. Die Gesprächsanrede im griechischen Epos und Drama der Blütezeit 1929 Stuttgart
39. West M.L. Homerus Ilias 2002 Vol Vols I-II Stuttgart

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Mnemosyne — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation