Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The Starting Points of Human Understanding

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

Πρῶτον νοητόν and φυσικὴ ἔννοια in Alkinoos’ Didaskalikos

image of Mnemosyne

AbstractThe present article discusses the notion of πρῶτον νοητόν in the Didaskalikos, where this notion indicates a cognitive primacy exclusively related to human understanding. It is argued that, due to the enrichment of Platonic doctrine with Stoic motives in this treatise, a dual starting point is ascribed here to human cognition. Both the πρῶτον νοητόν and the φυσικὴ ἔννοια function as such. The πρῶτον νοητόν is the primary object of a decarnate νόησις, the φυσικὴ ἔννοια our present reminiscence of this decarnate νόησις. The recognition of a genetic perspective in the Didaskalikos enables us to resolve the interpretative difficulties related to the restrictive expression οὐκ ἄνευ τοῦ ἐπιστηµονικοῦ λόγου, which characterizes the judgement of the πρῶτα νοητά by νόησις. Among the procedures employed to arrive at the starting points of human cognition are ‘analysis’ and ‘induction’. These specimina of an ‘investigation from below’ (κάτωθεν) contribute to the complex rhythm of the Didaskalikos. The tradition inaugurated by the treatise, i.e. the search for first known objects of human understanding in Greek, Arabic, and Latin philosophy, is accompanied by a tension between the empirical and the transcendental, which is used in the Didaskalikos to argue for the necessity of a Platonic frame, and consequently re-activated in all attempts to free the search for first known objects of human understanding from a Platonic ontology.

Affiliations: 1: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdamw.goris@vu.nl

Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/1568525x-12341244
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Aertsen J.A. Medieval Philosophy and the Transcendentals. The Case of Thomas Aquinas 1996 Leiden/New York/Köln
2. Aertsen J.A. Medieval Philosophy as Transcendental Thought. From Philip the Chancellor (ca. 1225) to Suárez 2012 Leiden/Boston http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004225855
3. Boys-Stones G. Bonazzi M. , Celluprica V. " Alcinous, Didaskalikos 4: In Defence of Dogmatism " L’eredità platonica. Studi sul platonismo da Arcesilao a Proclo 2005 Naples 203 234
4. Dillon J. Alcinous. The Handbook of Platonism 1993 Oxford
5. Edwards M.J. " Middle Platonism on the Beautiful and the Good " Mnemosyne 1991 Vol 44 161 165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156852591X00530
6. Goris W. The Scattered Field. History of Metaphysics in the Postmetaphysical Era 2004 Louvain
7. Goris W. Absolute Beginners. Der mittelalterliche Beitrag zu einem Ausgang vom Unbedingten 2007 Leiden/Boston http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004162150.i-294
8. Gulley N. " Greek Geometrical Analysis " Phronesis 1958 Vol 3 1 14 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156852858X00011
9. Helmig Chr. Ideas and Concepts. Proclus’ Theory of Knowledge between Platonic Recollection and Aristotelian Abstraction 2006 (Unpubl. Diss. Leuven)
10. Hintikka J. , Remes U. The Method of Analysis. Its Geometrical Origin and Its General Significance 1974 Dordrecht/Boston
11. Lloyd A.C. " Neoplatonic Logic and Aristotelian Logic " Phronesis 1955 Vol 1 59 62
12. Loenen J.H. " Albinus’ Metaphysics: An Attempt at Rehabilitation " Mnemosyne 1956 Vol 9 296 319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156852556X00395
13. Loenen J.H. " Albinus’ Metaphysics: An Attempt at Rehabilitation " Mnemosyne 1957 Vol 10 35 56 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156852557X00051
14. Mansfeld J. " Three Notes on Albinus " Thêta-Pi 1972 Vol 1 67 75
15. Opsomer J. In Search of the Truth. Academic Tendencies in Middle Platonism 1998 Brussels
16. Schrenk L.P. " Faculties of Judgment in the Didaskalikos " Mnemosyne 1991 Vol 44 347 363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156852591X00044
17. Sedley D.N. Algra K.A. , et al " Alcinous’ Epistemology " Polyhistor. Studies in the History and Historiography of Ancient Philosophy 1996 Leiden/New York/Köln 300 312
18. Tuominen M. Apprehension and Argument. Ancient Theories of Starting Points for Knowledge 2007 Dordrecht
19. Vallat Ph. Farabi et l’École d’Alexandrie. Des prémisses de la connaissance à la philosophie politique 2004 Paris
20. Whittaker J. , Louis P. Alcinoos: Enseignement des Doctrines de Platon. Introduction, texte établi et commenté par J. Whittaker et traduit par P. Louis 1990 Paris
21. Witt R.E. Albinus and the History of Middle Platonism 1971 Amsterdam
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/1568525x-12341244
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/1568525x-12341244
2014-03-31
2016-12-03

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Mnemosyne — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation