Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The Volo Command in Roman Comedy

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Mnemosyne

The contribution aims to show how commands and requests with volo (and nolo), e.g. volo te facere, “I want you to do [this]”, are constrained by social variables, specifically the relationship of hearer to speaker. There are 181 relevant tokens gathered from the corpus of extant Roman comedy. First, three kinds of volo command are distinguished and discussed: volo+bald infinitive, volo+accusativus cum infinitivo, and volo+finite clause with subjunctive. Second, the following are demonstrated: (1.) volo+AcI and volo+subjunctive typically convey peremptory commands; (2.) volo+bald infinitive “prefers” requests compared to the former two expressions; (3.) all three expressions tend to be used in contexts where the speaker enjoys greater authority than the hearer. To conclude, it is suggested that Plautus may use the form to support the authoritative stance of characters in Amphitruo, Casina and Captivi.

Affiliations: 1: University of Massachusetts Boston, Classics and Religious Studies peter.lech@umb.edu

Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/1568525x-12341827
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Bennett C.E. Syntax of the Early Latin Verb 1966 Vol vol. 1 Hildesheim
2. Brown P. , Levinson S. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage 1987 Cambridge
3. Butler C. Statistics in Linguistics 1985 Oxford and New York
4. De Melo W. The Early Latin Verb System 2007 Oxford http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199209026.001.0001
5. De Melo W. Plautus 2011-2013 Vol vols. 1-5 Cambridge, MA
6. Dickey E. " How to Say ‘Please’ in Classical Latin " cq 2012a Vol 62 2 731 748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0009838812000286
7. Dickey E. Probert P. , Willi A. " The Rules of Politeness and Latin Request Formulae " Laws and Rules in Indo-European 2012b Oxford 313 328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199609925.003.0017
8. Ferri R. " Politeness in Latin Comedy: Some Preliminary Thoughts " md 2008 Vol 61 15 28
9. Ferri R. Leiwo M. , Halla-aho H. , Vierros M. " How to Say No in Latin " Variation and Change in Greek and Latin 2012 Helsinki 105 127
10. Fraenkel E. Plautine Elements in Plautus 1922 Oxford Eng. trans. Drevikosky, T., Muecke, F. 2007
11. Fraser C. , Brown P. Scherer K. , Giles H. " Speech as a Marker of Situation " Social Markers in Speech 1979 Cambridge 33 62
12. Gilleland M. The Linguistic Differentiation of Character Type and Sex in the Comedies of Plautus and Terence 1979 Diss. University of Virginia, usa
13. Grice H.P. Cole P. , Morgan J. " Logic and Conversation " Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts 1975 New York 41 58
14. Haffter H. Untersuchungen zur altlateinischen Dichtersprache 1934 Berlin
15. Hall J. " Cicero Fam. 5.8 and Fam. 15.5 in the Light of Modern Politeness Theory " Antichthon 1996 Vol 30 19 33
16. Hall J. " Politeness and Formality in Cicero’s Letter to Matius (Fam. 11.27)" mh 2005 Vol 62 193 213
17. Hall J. Politeness and Politics in Cicero’s Letters 2009 Oxford http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195329063.001.0001
18. Kühner R. , Holzweissig F. , Stegmann K. Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache 1912-1914 Vol vol. II 1 Hannover 2
19. LeBreton J. Etudes sur la langue et la grammaire de Cicéron 1901 Paris
20. Leo F. Plauti Comoediae 1895 Berlin
21. Leo F. Plautinische Forschungen: Zur Kritik und Geschichte der Komödie 1912 Berlin
22. Leumann M. , Hoffman J.B. , Szantyr A. Lateinische Grammatik 1963-1977 Vol vol. II 2 Munich
23. Lindsay W.M. Plauti Comoediae 1910 Oxford
24. MacCary W.T. , Willcock M.M. Plautus: Casina 1976 Cambridge
25. McCarthy K. Slaves, Masters, and the Art of Authority in Plautine Comedy 2000 Princeton
26. Ritschl F. , Loewe G. , Goetz G. , Schoell F. T. Macci Plauti Comoediae 1878-1902 Leipzig
27. Risselada R. The Imperative and Other Directive Expressions in Latin: A Study in the Pragmatics of a Dead Language 1993 Amsterdam
28. Schauwecker Y. " Zum Sprechverhalten der Frauentypen bei Plautus " Gymnasium 2002 Vol 109 191 211
29. Searle J.R. Cole P. , Morgan J. " Indirect Speech Acts " Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts 1975 New York 59 82
30. Searle J.R. " A Classification of Illocutionary Acts " Language in Society 1976 Vol 5 1 24 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837
31. Watts R. Politeness 2003 Cambridge http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/1568525x-12341827
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/1568525x-12341827
2016-06-23
2017-12-13

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Mnemosyne — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation