Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

On the Relationship Between Method and the Object of Study When Studying Religion

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Numen

AbstractIf a discipline is defined by the object of its study, then the definition of the object of study has a priori paramount importance. Studies of the evolution of the study of religion show that researchers have been unable to escape their own socio-political contexts. I begin with a brief consideration of the evolution of superstition as a means to gain perspective on the evolution of the study of religion and definitions of religion and as a cautionary note to both the contextual study of religion and the cognitive-evolutionary (ce) study of religion. I then continue with an overview of our conference, “Researching Religion: Methodological Debates in Anthropology and the Study of Religion,” at Aarhus University, and the seven articles published in this special double issue of Numen. Taken together, they reflect and address an international rupture between the contextual and the ce study of religion, and point towards productive avenues for future research.

Affiliations: 1: Aarhus UniversitetBygning 4236-246,Moesgård Allé 20, 8270 HøjbjergDenmarketncw@cas.au.dk

Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685276-12341312
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Anagost Ann S. "“Politics and Magic in Contemporary China.”" Modern China 1987 Vol 13 1 40 61
2. Anagost Ann S. Keyes Charles F. , Kendall Laurel , Hardacre Helen "“The Politics of Ritual Displacement.”" Asian Visions of Authority: Religion and the Modern States of East and Southeast Asia 1994 Honolulu University of Hawaii Press 221 254
3. Bacon Francis Elliott Charles W. "“XVII Of Superstition.”" Essays, Civil and Moral & The New Atlantis by Francis Bacon; Aeropagitica & Tractate of Education by John Milton; Religio Medici by Sir Thomas Browne: The Five Foot Shelf of Classics 2009 (1909–1914) Vol vol. 3 New York Cosimo Books 47 Harvard Classics
4. Barrett Nathaniel "“Toward an Alternative Evolutionary Theory of Religion: Looking Past Computational Evolutionary Psychology to a Wider Field of Possibilities.”" Journal of the American Academy of Religion 2010 Vol 78 3 583 621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfq019
5. Duara Prasenajit "“Knowledge and Power in the Discourse of Modernity: The Campaigns Against Popular Religion in Twentieth-Century China.”" Journal of Asian Studies 1991 Vol 50 1 67 83 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2057476
6. Encyclopedia Americana 1984 Danbury, Conn. Grolier
7. Fearon John Daniel Catholic University of America "“Superstition.”" The Catholic Encyclopedia 1967 (accessed 29 November 2013) Vol vol. 14 Farmington Hills, Mich. Gale Publishing
8. Geertz Armin W. , McCutcheon Russell T. Geertz Armin W. , McCutcheon Russell T. "“The Role of Method and Theory in the IAHR.”" Perspectives on Method and Theory in the Study of Religion. Adjunct Proceedings of the XVIIth Congress of the International Association for the History of Religions Mexico City, 1995 2000 Leiden Brill 3 37
9. Griswold Charles L. Adam Smith and the Virtues of Enlightenment 1998 Cambridge Cambridge University Press http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511608964
10. Hervieu-Léger Danièle Hall David D. "“What Scripture Tells Me: Spontaneity and Regulation with the Catholic Charismatic Revival.”" Lived Religion in America: Toward a History of Practice 1997 Princeton Princeton University Press 22 39
11. Honko Lauri Science of Religion: Studies in Methodology. Proceedings of the Study Conference of the International Association for the History of Religions, held in Turku, Finland, August 27–31, 1973 1979 The Hague Mouton Publishers
12. Jaucourt Louis, chevalier de. Diderot Denis , d’Alembert Jean le Rond "“Superstition.”" Encyclopédie ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers 1765 Vol vol. 15 Paris Briasson 669 671
13. Jensen Jeppe Sinding "“Revisiting the Insider-Outsider Debate: Dismantling a Pseudo-problem in the Study of Religion.”" Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 2011 Vol 23 1 29 47 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157006811X549689
14. Jensen Tim Gasparro G. Sfameni "“From History of Religions to the Study of Religions: Trends and Tendencies in Denmark.”" Themes and Problems in the History of Religions in Contemporary Europe 2002 Cosenza Edizione Lionelli Giordano 183 208
15. Josephson Jason Ānanda The Invention of Religion in Japan 2012 Chicago University of Chicago Press http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226412351.001.0001
16. Margel Serge Superstition: L’anthropologie du religieux en terre de chrétienté 2005 Paris Galilée
17. Martin Dale Inventing Superstition: From the Hippocratics to the Christians 2004 Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press
18. McCutcheon Russell "“Will Your Cognitive Anchor Hold in the Storms of Culture?”" Journal of the American Academy of Religion 2010 Vol 78 4 1182 1193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfq085
19. Schloss Jeffrey P. , Barrett Justin L. , Murray Michael J. "“Looking Past vs. Overlooking Cognitive-Evolutionary Accounts of Religion: A Reponse to Nathaniel Barrett.”" Journal of the American Academy of Religion 2010 Vol 78 3 622 628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfq049
20. Stausberg Michael "“The Study of Religion(s) in Western Europe (I): Prehistory and History until World War II.”" Religion 2007 Vol 37 4 294 318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.religion.2007.10.001
21. Stausberg Michael "“The Study of Religion(s) in Western Europe (II): Institutional Developments after World War II.”" Religion 2008 Vol 38 4 305 318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.religion.2008.08.008
22. Stausberg Michael "“The Study of Religion(s) in Western Europe (III): Further Developments after World War II.”" Religion 2009 Vol 39 3 261 282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.religion.2009.06.001
23. Taves Ann "“2010 Presidential Address: ‘Religion’ in the Humanities and the Humanities in the University.”" Journal of the American Academy of Religion 2011 Vol 79 2 287 314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfr004
24. Thomson James Macfarquhar Colin , Gleig George , Thomson James "“Superstition.”" Encyclopedia Britannica 1797 3rd ed. Edinburgh A. Bell and C. Macfarquhar
25. Wilhelm Joseph "“Superstition.”" The Catholic Encyclopedia 1912 New York Robert Appleton Company
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15685276-12341312
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685276-12341312
2014-03-18
2016-12-06

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Numen — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation