Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Full Access The Origin and Aim of Posterior Analytics II.19

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

The Origin and Aim of Posterior Analytics II.19

  • PDF
  • HTML
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Phronesis

Abstract In Posterior Analytics II.19 Aristotle raises and answers the question, how do first principles become known? The usual view is that the question asks about the process or method by which we learn principles and that his answer is induction. I argue that the question asks about the original prior knowledge from which principles become known and that his answer is perception. Hence the aim of II.19 is not to explain how we get all the way to principles but to defend the claim that our knowledge of them originates in perception. Aristotle explains how we learn principles earlier in book II, in his account of definitional inquiry. In II.19 he explains how we reach by induction the preliminary accounts necessary for such inquiries.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Philosophy, Boston University Boston, MA 02215 USA dbronste@bu.edu

Abstract In Posterior Analytics II.19 Aristotle raises and answers the question, how do first principles become known? The usual view is that the question asks about the process or method by which we learn principles and that his answer is induction. I argue that the question asks about the original prior knowledge from which principles become known and that his answer is perception. Hence the aim of II.19 is not to explain how we get all the way to principles but to defend the claim that our knowledge of them originates in perception. Aristotle explains how we learn principles earlier in book II, in his account of definitional inquiry. In II.19 he explains how we reach by induction the preliminary accounts necessary for such inquiries.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/15685284/57/1/15685284_057_01_S02_text.html;jsessionid=5TkculWFyR2ayEIchRwntsXY.x-brill-live-03?itemId=/content/journals/10.1163/156852812x607289&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
/content/journals/10.1163/156852812x607289
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156852812x607289
Loading
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156852812x607289
2012-01-01
2016-12-11

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation