Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Full Access Motion and Change in Aristotle’s Physics 5. 1

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the Brill platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.
Motion and Change in Aristotle’s Physics 5. 1

  • PDF
  • HTML
Add to Favorites

image of Phronesis

Abstract This paper illustrates how Aristotle’s topological theses about change in Physics 5-6 can help address metaphysical issues. Two distinctions from Physics 5. 1 are discussed: changing per se versus changing per aliud; motion versus change. Change from white to black is motion and alteration, whereas change from white to not white is neither. But is not every change from white to black identical with a change from white to not white? Theses from Physics 6 refute the identity. Is change from white to black at least accompanied by change from white to not white? Perhaps, but given further theses from Physics 6, this supposition yields unwelcome consequences. Most likely, when something changes from white to black it changes merely per aliud, not per se, from white to not white. Genuine change between white and not white is found elsewhere; its admission has bearing on Aristotle’s theory of perception.

Affiliations: 1: Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Excellence Cluster Topoi Hannoversche Straße 6, 10099 Berlin Germany Jacob.rosen@philosophie.hu-berlin.de

Abstract This paper illustrates how Aristotle’s topological theses about change in Physics 5-6 can help address metaphysical issues. Two distinctions from Physics 5. 1 are discussed: changing per se versus changing per aliud; motion versus change. Change from white to black is motion and alteration, whereas change from white to not white is neither. But is not every change from white to black identical with a change from white to not white? Theses from Physics 6 refute the identity. Is change from white to black at least accompanied by change from white to not white? Perhaps, but given further theses from Physics 6, this supposition yields unwelcome consequences. Most likely, when something changes from white to black it changes merely per aliud, not per se, from white to not white. Genuine change between white and not white is found elsewhere; its admission has bearing on Aristotle’s theory of perception.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/15685284/57/1/15685284_057_01_S03_text.html;jsessionid=1rwim47e5v005.x-brill-live-02?itemId=/content/journals/10.1163/156852812x607298&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
/content/journals/10.1163/156852812x607298
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156852812x607298
Loading
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156852812x607298
2012-01-01
2016-07-30

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation