Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The Annicerean Cyrenaics on Friendship and Habitual Good Will

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Phronesis

Unlike mainstream Cyrenaics, the Annicereans deny that friendship is chosen only because of its usefulness: the wise person cares for her friend and endures pains for him because of her goodwill and love. Nonetheless, the Annicereans maintain that your own pleasure is the telos and that a friend’s happiness is not intrinsically choiceworthy. I argue that this is to be explained by evidence for an Annicerean doctrine of ‘non-hedonic habits’, which allows them to abandon psychological hedonism while still maintaining hedonism regarding well-being.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Philosophy, Georgia State University 25 Park Place, Suite 1600 Atlanta GA 30303USA tokeefe@gsu.edu

Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685284-12341329
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Annas J.The Morality of Happiness1993Oxford
2. Brunschwig J. Schofield M., Striker G."‘The Cradle Argument in Epicureanism and Stoicism’"The Norms of Nature1986Cambridge113144
3. Cooper J."‘Pleasure and Desire in Epicurus’"Reason and Emotion: Essays on Ancient Moral Psychology and Ethical Theory1998Princeton485514
4. Evans M."‘Can Epicureans Be Friends?’"Ancient Philosophy2004Vol 24407424
5. Gauthier D.Morals by Agreement1986Oxford
6. Hume D. Nidditch P. H.Enquiries Concerning the Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals19753rd. edn.OxfordOriginally published 1777
7. Irwin T."‘Aristippus against Happiness’"Monist1991Vol 745582
8. Lampe K.The Birth of Hedonism: The Cyrenaic Philosophers and Pleasure as a Way of Life.2014Princeton
9. Mannebach E.Aristippi et Cyrenaicorum Fragmenta1961Leiden
10. O’Keefe T."‘Is Epicurean Friendship Altruistic?’"Apeiron2001Vol 34269305
11. O’Keefe T."‘The Cyrenaics on Pleasure, Happiness, and Future-Concern’"Phronesis2002Vol 47395416
12. O’Keefe T. Zilioli U."‘The Sources and Scope of Cyrenaic Scepticism’"From the Socratics to the Socratic Schools: Classical Ethics, Metaphysics and Epistemology2015London99113
13. Sedley D. N. Everson S."‘The Inferential Foundations of Epicurean Ethics’"Ethics1998Cambridge129150
14. Tsouna V.The Epistemology of the Cyrenaic School1998Cambridge
15. Tsouna V. Canto-Sperber M., Pellegrin P."‘Is there an Exception to Greek Eudaimonism?’"Le style de le pensée: recueil de textes en hommage à Jacques Brunschwig2002Paris464489
16. Tsouna V.The Ethics of Philodemus2007Oxford
17. Woolf R."‘What Kind of Hedonist was Epicurus?’"Phronesis2004Vol 49303322
18. Zilioli U.The Cyrenaics2012Durham
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15685284-12341329
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685284-12341329
2017-06-06
2017-11-23

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Phronesis — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation